Final answer:
The question seems to deal with geometric relations between triangles ABC and PQR, but the provided dimensions for PR likely contain a typo, preventing an accurate solution or discussion on triangle properties.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the comparison of lengths and congruent triangles within two different geometric figures, triangles ABC and PQR. Given the side lengths of both triangles, the aim might be to determine a relationship or to verify certain geometric properties such as congruence or similarity. However, the unusually large length of PR suggests there might be a typo, as it is not proportional to the other sides of triangle PQR.
Without additional context or a correct set of dimensions, a specific solution or further exploration of these triangles' properties cannot be provided accurately. If PR is indeed meant to be 235cm, the given figures would not form a traditional triangle, and therefore the typical geometric properties would not apply.
If PR is a typo and should be a smaller length consistent with the others, then it's possible to discuss the potential for similarity or congruence between triangles ABC and PQR based on side lengths and angles.