110k views
5 votes
Suppose we applied drug X before a known agonist and observe no effect. a. Can drug X be an agonist or an antagonist? b. Suppose we increased the dose of the agonist after application of drug X and still observed no effect, is drug X a competitive or a noncompetitive ligand? Explain your answer

User Khay
by
8.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

If drug X applied before a known agonist has no effect, it suggests that drug X is an antagonist. If the dose of the agonist is increased after application of drug X and still no effect is observed, it suggests that drug X is a noncompetitive ligand.

Step-by-step explanation:

If drug X applied before a known agonist has no effect, it suggests that drug X is an antagonist. An agonist mimics the effects of a neurotransmitter, while an antagonist blocks or impedes the normal activity of a neurotransmitter. In this case, when drug X is applied before the agonist, it prevents the agonist from having its normal effect.

If the dose of the agonist is increased after application of drug X and still no effect is observed, it suggests that drug X is a noncompetitive ligand. A competitive ligand competes with the agonist for the same binding site on the receptor, while a noncompetitive ligand binds to a different site on the receptor and still prevents the agonist from having its effect.

User Xyrus
by
8.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.