176k views
1 vote
Which piece of evidence best supports the claim that banning the use of trans fats in restaurants has improved the general health of city residents?

A) Since the ban was enforced, city hospitals experienced a 6% drop in cases of heart attack and stroke.
B) Before the ban, nearly 40% of local restaurants used trans fat in their food.
C) Trans fat typically account for less than 10% of the total fat grams in a food serving but they can do major damage to arteries.
D) A recent poll showed that 90% of the local medical community supported the ban, but only 45% of the residents supported it.

User Krun
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The best piece of evidence is that city hospitals experienced a 6% drop in cases of heart attack and stroke since the ban on trans fats was enforced.

Step-by-step explanation:

The best piece of evidence that supports the claim that banning the use of trans fats in restaurants has improved the general health of city residents is option A) Since the ban was enforced, city hospitals experienced a 6% drop in cases of heart attack and stroke.

This evidence indicates that the ban on trans fats has had a positive impact on the health of city residents by reducing the occurrence of heart attacks and strokes.

Furthermore, this evidence directly links the ban on trans fats to an improvement in health, making it the strongest piece of evidence to support the claim.

User Dertseha
by
8.1k points