Final answer:
A potential problem for Kantian deontology is that it does not account for the consequences of actions and does not provide clear guidelines for resolving conflicts between duties. It also does not address the subjective nature of ethical judgments.
Step-by-step explanation:
A potential problem for Kantian deontology is that it does not account for the consequences of actions. Kant believed that actions should be judged based on their moral duty, rather than their outcomes. However, some argue that consequences should be considered in determining the morality of an action. For example, if a person tries and fails to murder someone, according to Kantian deontology, they would be just as guilty as someone who succeeds. This raises questions about whether the intention or the outcome should be the determining factor in assessing the morality of an action.
Another potential problem is that Kantian deontology does not provide clear guidelines for resolving conflicts between duties. In situations where there are multiple moral obligations that conflict with each other, it can be difficult to determine which duty should take precedence.
Furthermore, Kantian deontology does not address the subjective nature of ethical judgments. It does not take into account the individual's feelings and emotions towards their actions. For example, a person who feels at ease with their actions may consider them to be morally right, even if they do not align with Kantian moral rules.