Question

reuben agrees to sell his taco delight restaurant to sami. the parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement. later, the parties dispute some of the provisions. in litigation, sami offers evidence to contradict the written terms. most likely, the court will reuben agrees to sell his taco delight restaurant to sami. the parties intend their written contract to be a final statement of the terms of their agreement. later, the parties dispute some of the provisions. in litigation, sami offers evidence to contradict the written terms. most likely, the court will reform the written terms to match the evidence. exclude the evidence. strike a balance between the evidence and the written terms. dismiss the case.

Answer 1

In litigation, evidence to contradict the written terms of a contract is typically excluded by the court, which focuses on the written contract as the final statement of the parties' agreement.

Step-by-step explanation:

In litigation, when the parties dispute some provisions of a written contract, it is generally not allowed to offer evidence to contradict the written terms. The court will typically exclude the evidence and focus on the written contract as the final statement of the parties' agreement. This principle is known as the parol evidence rule, which prevents parties from introducing external evidence to change or add to the terms of a written contract. The court's role is to interpret and enforce the written contract based on its terms.