Question

zion belmont is a staff accountant at a bank in the downtown phoenix area. belmont is responsible for conducting audits in various branches of the bank. while en route to one such audit, zion has an accident injuring himself and one other person. which of the following statements is true in the context of the scenario? a. the bank will be liable for any injuries to the person in the accident with zion. b. the bank will be liable for any injuries to zion but not the other person in the accident with zion. c. as an independent contractor, zion will be responsible for the other person's treatment, not the bank. d. the bank will not be responsible for any injuries.

Answer 1

The bank would most likely be liable for any injuries to Zion and the other person in the accident due to Zion's status as an employee and the principle of vicarious liability.

Therefore the correct answer is option A. the bank will be liable for any injuries to the person in the accident with zion

Step-by-step explanation:

In this scenario, the bank would most likely be liable for any injuries to both Zion and the other person in the accident with Zion. As an employee of the bank, Zion was likely acting within the scope of his employment when the accident occurred, making the bank responsible for any damages or injuries caused.

Furthermore, under the principle of vicarious liability, an employer can be held responsible for the actions of their employees if those actions were carried out within the course of their employment. Since Zion was on his way to conduct an audit - a task directly related to his role as a staff accountant at the bank - his actions would likely fall within the scope of his employment.

It is important to note that this answer is based on general legal principles and may vary depending on the specific laws and circumstances of the jurisdiction in which the accident took place. It is always advisable to consult with a legal professional for accurate and specific advice.