219k views
5 votes
one issue before the court in the hamill v. cheley colorado camps, inc., case was: a. whether camp cheley should have taken extra precautions. b. whether prospective negligent claims were waived in the risk release form. c. whether hamill's mother should have skimmed the risk release form. d. whether the exculpatory clause in the risk release form was reasonable.

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The court case Hamill v. Cheley Colorado Camps, Inc. centered on whether negligent claims were waived in a risk release form, focusing on the enforceability of its exculpatory clause. Therefore, the correct option is B.

Step-by-step explanation:

The issue before the court in the Hamill v. Cheley Colorado Camps, Inc., case was whether prospective negligent claims were waived in the risk release form. The central question was whether the exculpatory clause within the risk release form that participants or their guardians signed was enforceable, thereby releasing the camp from liability for any negligence.

Courts generally assess such clauses for their clarity, the scope of the release, and whether they violate public policy. This case is an illustration of contract law principles, particularly as they pertain to the enforceability of exculpatory clauses in situations where parties are engaging in activities that may involve inherent risks.

User Tggm
by
7.3k points