99.5k views
4 votes
The

VII. Item. They have provided and ordered that when anyone has died no person should dare or presume to
present or to send any gift before or after burial to the former dwelling place of such a dead person or any other
place on the said occasion or to attend or to go to a meal in that house or place on the said occasion on penalty of
£25.... Children, carnal brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews of such a dead person and their children,
however, shall be expected [from this provision]
what are three facts questions and responses about this paragraph

User Justkris
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The paragraph discusses historical funeral customs and laws that impose restrictions on mourning practices, with a financial penalty for violations except for close relatives. It indicates an effort to maintain social order, discourage excess, and respect familial bonds.

Step-by-step explanation:

The paragraph in question appears to relate to historical funeral customs and laws, which specify practices and restrictions related to mourning and the commemoration of the deceased. This might reflect the cultural, religious, or legal context of a particular time and place in history. Rules regarding mourning often served to maintain social order, prevent excessive expenditures, and in the given example, enforce specific behavior during the mourning period with a financial penalty for non-compliance, except for close relatives who were exempted.

Three Facts, Questions, and Responses:

  1. Funeral customs and laws: What do the provided funeral customs and laws indicate? They suggest that in the historical context of the paragraph, there were strict regulations governing how people could conduct themselves following someone's death. Gifts and communal meals, which are often part of mourning practices, were restricted, and a significant fine was imposed to enforce these laws.
  2. Mourning exemptions: Who was exempt from these restrictions? Close relatives such as children, siblings, nieces, and nephews were allowed to diverge from these prescribed behaviors, indicating an acknowledgment of the importance of familial bonds even within the structured legal constraints of mourning.
  3. Penalties for non-compliance: What was the consequence of defying these mourning regulations? A hefty fine of £25 was imposed on those who attended meals or sent gifts, illustrating the seriousness with which these customs were upheld to preserve social mores and possibly to curb excessive spending during the mourning period.

User Giancarlos
by
8.2k points