Final answer:
Considering that backfat measurements can be breed and purpose-specific, an animal with 0.36 inches of backfat may or may not be considered too fat depending on the context. Without more information, a definitive answer on whether this measurement is outside the acceptable range cannot be given.
Step-by-step explanation:
The main answer to whether an animal with 0.36 inches of backfat at the 12th rib is considered too fat is dependent on the specific standards and breed of the animal in question. A definitive 'True' or 'False' cannot be given without this context; however, in general livestock evaluation, there are acceptable ranges of backfat that are considered ideal for different types of livestock. In some cases, 0.36 inches might be acceptable, while in others, it could indeed be considered too much. Evaluating backfat is a common practice in animal husbandry and directly affects the market value and quality grading of meat.
In the agriculture industry, there are accepted standards for backfat thickness that indicate an animal's health and the quality of meat it will produce. These standards can vary by the species of animal, its breed, and the purpose of the production (e.g., lean cuts of meat versus marbled meat). For competitive livestock judging or within certain agricultural guidelines, there might be a specific range deemed optimal, and measurements above that range could be considered excessive.