137k views
0 votes
Is middle kingdoms economics/trade good or bad? Explain why it’s either good or bad.

A) Good, as it fostered economic growth and stability through trade networks.
B) Bad, due to its overreliance on centralized control and limited market competition.
Is old kingdoms economics/trade good or bad? Explain why it’s either good or bad.
A) Good, because it promoted cultural exchange and technological advancement.
B) Bad, as it led to economic stagnation and inequality within the society.

User VDP
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final Answer:

1.For the Middle Kingdoms economics/trade: A) Good, as it fostered economic growth and stability through trade networks. Therefor, the correct option is A) Good, as it fostered economic growth and stability through trade networks.

2.For the Old Kingdoms economics/trade: A) Good, because it promoted cultural exchange and technological advancement. Therefore, the correct option is A) Good, because it promoted cultural exchange and technological advancement.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Middle Kingdoms' trade systems facilitated economic prosperity by establishing extensive networks, encouraging commerce, and enhancing stability through increased inter-regional connections. These trade routes, like the Silk Road, promoted cultural exchange, technological diffusion, and economic growth, contributing to societal development and wealth generation.

Conversely, centralized control and limited market competition in this system sometimes resulted in monopolies and less diversified markets, potentially leading to economic imbalances or dependency on certain trade goods. Therefor, the correct option is A) Good, as it fostered economic growth and stability through trade networks.

2. Regarding Old Kingdoms, the economics/trade systems were beneficial due to fostering cultural exchange and the dissemination of knowledge and innovations. These exchanges led to the spread of technologies, ideas, and cultural practices, enriching societies and enabling advancements in various fields.

However, such systems might have drawbacks, including economic stagnation in some regions or disparities in wealth and access to resources within societies, particularly if trade was controlled by a select few or if certain areas benefitted more from trade than others. Overall, while both eras' trade had positives, they also carried potential downsides, underscoring the complexities within historical economic systems. Therefore, the correct option is A) Good, because it promoted cultural exchange and technological advancement.

User Aneesh Sivaraman
by
7.7k points