Final answer:
The statement cannot be definitively classified as true or false as it depends on context; superior strategy can sometimes overcome deficits in numbers and resources, but overwhelming disadvantages may be difficult to surmount. Strategy and context are key determinants of the outcome.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement says, 'Superior strategy formulation is well and good, but it cannot overcome an opponent's superiority in numbers and resources.' This sentiment aligns with certain military principles that suggest while strategy is critically important, it cannot always compensate for a significant disadvantage in numbers and resources. Nevertheless, military history and the teachings of various strategists, such as those hinted at in the references provided, offer numerous examples where superior strategy has indeed led to victory despite being outnumbered or out-resourced. For instance, numerical weakness can be offset by strategic advantages such as surprise, terrain, or unity of command, as suggested by points 14, 16, 17, and 18.
However, it is also true that an overwhelming disadvantage can sometimes be insurmountable, which is implied in points 9, 19, and 20. In essence, the truth of the statement is conditional and can be both true and false depending on the context and extent of numerical and resource disparities between opposing forces. So, a definitive answer of true or false is overly simplistic, and a more nuanced perspective that takes into account various factors would be appropriate.