Final answer:
The statement is true; analytical and intuitive thinking should indeed complement each other, enhancing discovery and understanding in scientific endeavors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that analytical and intuitive thinking should complement each other is true. These two types of thinking correspond with different forms of scientific study: descriptive and hypothesis-based science. Analytical thinking involves a methodical approach to problem-solving, using data analysis and logical reasoning. Intuitive thinking, on the other hand, is more about instinctive understanding or the ability to perceive or know things without conscious reasoning. Integrating both approaches can lead to a well-rounded and robust methodology for discovery and understanding, as illustrated by the invention of Velcro, which resulted from both careful observation (descriptive science) and experimental problem-solving (hypothesis-based science).