Final answer:
Studies imply that transferred, particularly violent, offenders are more likely to re-offend, influenced by loss of social bonds and economic factors. Long-term imprisonment for lesser crimes does not significantly reduce crime rates, and policies must consider the complexity of trends and factors influencing crime and recidivism.
Step-by-step explanation:
Studies conducted across the United States suggest that transferred offenders, especially violent ones, are more likely to re-offend. This can be attributed to several factors including the loss of social bonds they made in prison, which leads to a feeling of disconnection from society upon release. Additionally, economic hardships and the need to respond to different cultural values in their communities can influence reoffending behaviors.
Considering the broader context, it's important to understand that while 'getting tough on crime' has led to a decline in crime rates since the 1980s, new research indicates that long-term imprisonment for lesser crimes does little to reduce overall crime rates. In dealing with different types of offenders, evidence shows that incarceration seems effective for high-risk offenders but not for those convicted of less serious or drug-related offenses.
Labeling Theory and Recidivism
In the case of a convicted sexual offender reoffending shortly after parole, labeling theory can provide an explanation. The theory suggests that individuals are labeled deviant by society and may accept this label as a master status, which can lead to a cycle of reoffending.
Overall, crafting criminal justice policies requires a nuanced understanding that recognizes the complexity of crime trends, the effectiveness of various sentencing strategies, and the socioeconomic factors that influence recidivism.