Final answer:
The belief that Taylor's scientific management was motivated by worker satisfaction is false; his primary goal was to maximize productivity and efficiency. Worker satisfaction was not the main concern; any improvements in worker conditions or pay came as secondary effects of efficiency gains.
Step-by-step explanation:
The primary issue that motivated Frederick W. Taylor to create a more scientific approach to management was not worker satisfaction, but rather to maximize productivity and efficiency within the workplace. Therefore, the assertion that worker satisfaction was the driving force behind Taylor's scientific management is false. Through careful study and design, Taylor sought to optimize every aspect of the production process by eliminating unnecessary steps and wasted motions. The goal was to increase efficiency which, according to Taylor, would lead to the best outcome for both the company and the workers. His approach to scientific management emphasized the transfer of knowledge from workers to management to establish the best methods of working. Taylor did, at times, introduce methods such as work rests which inadvertently improved worker conditions and pay based on increased productivity. However, these outcomes were pursued not to enhance worker satisfaction directly, but as a byproduct of striving for heightened efficiency.
Taylorism, despite increasing wages and lowering production costs in some cases, was criticized for treating workers as machines and potentially leading to worker exploitation. This treatment and the tight control of work practices often led workers to resent the loss of autonomy and the strict managerial authority that came with scientific management.