Final answer:
The difference between Practice Standard 400-2 and 400-3 is between 'A. Analyzing and evaluating' for 400-2 and 'B. Developing and presenting' for 400-3, related to evaluating sources or work compared to developing and presenting findings in academic settings.
Step-by-step explanation:
The difference between Practice Standard 400-2 and 400-3 pertains to the skills and tasks associated with evaluating and developing information or work, respectively. In the context of educational settings, Standard 400-2 may focus on the significance of evaluating criteria when considering choices, such as analyzing the effectiveness of different sources for a research paper, courses, or peer work. Meanwhile, Standard 400-3 may emphasize the development and presentation of one's findings or work, such as presenting a well-structured analytical report that examines a subject matter through critiques, comparisons, and problem-solving.
Analysis and evaluation play a crucial role in ensuring the logical progression and effectiveness of academic or professional projects. Therefore, when considering the options presented by the question (A. Analyzing and evaluating, B. Developing and presenting, C. Processing and developing, D. Evaluating and processing), the difference between the two practice standards lies mainly in analyzing and evaluating versus developing and presenting. Hence, based on the information given and the focus of the tasks described, the corresponding difference between Practice Standard 400-2 and 400-3 should be 'A. Analyzing and evaluating' for 400-2 and 'B. Developing and presenting' for 400-3.