Question

Judge Brett Kavanaugh faced a historic hearing in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, September 27, over assault

allegations dating back to his high school and college years.
His 1983 high school yearbook refers to plenty of drinking while at Georgetown Preparatory School, the private all-boys school in
Maryland, including being treasurer of the "Keg City Club" - "100 Kegs or Bust."
Select the option that BEST explains how these details develop a CENTRAL idea of the article.
Both contribute to the idea that people's words and actions in their youth can follow them into adulthood.
Both support the idea that the FBI has found evidence that confirms the allegations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Both support the idea that there have been other hearings in the past in which a Supreme Court nominee testified before the Senate
O Judiciary Committee.
Both contribute to the idea that teenagers nowadays are more aware of their actions than people were in the past.

Answer 1

Judge Brett Kavanaugh's high school yearbook details contribute to the idea that past behaviors can impact one's future, especially when considered for a Supreme Court nomination which carries lifelong tenure and ideological influence. The correct answer is option: a) Both contribute to the idea that people's words and actions in their youth can follow them into adulthood.

Step-by-step explanation:

Details about Judge Brett Kavanaugh's high school yearbook and drinking club membership develop the central idea that people's past words and actions can have long-term consequences, particularly for public figures. Given the lifetime appointment of Supreme Court justices and the ideological legacy they carry, every aspect of their past is scrutinized, as seen in historical cases like Robert Bork and Douglas Ginsburg.

Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings were highly partisan, putting the independence of the judiciary into question and illustrating how past behaviors and affiliations, like those recorded in a yearbook, can become pivotal in the intensely political process of a Supreme Court nomination.