75.2k views
4 votes
The Battle at Germantown was intended to be revenge for the Paoli Massacre.

A. true
B. false

User Toy
by
7.0k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The Battle at Germantown was not specifically intended as revenge for the Paoli Massacre, making the statement false. Important historical truths include the Proclamation of 1763 being a response to Pontiac's War, and the Battle of Saratoga turning the tide of war in favor of the Americans. The assertion that King Philip's War began with the assassination of a praying Indian and Harvard graduate is false.

Step-by-step explanation:

The assertion that the Battle at Germantown was intended as revenge for the Paoli Massacre is false. The Battle of Germantown took place on October 4, 1777, during the Philadelphia Campaign of the American Revolutionary War. While the Continental Army did seek to engage British forces after their defeat at the Battle of Brandywine, the primary goal of the Battle of Germantown was to break the British hold on Philadelphia, not purely as reprisal for the Paoli Massacre. However, it is worth noting that the loss at Paoli may have influenced the American decision to launch a surprise attack during the Battle of Germantown.

Regarding other historical events, it is true that the Proclamation of 1763 was enacted in response to Pontiac's War and as a way to stabilize relations with Native American tribes by curbing westward expansion.

The battle that turned the tide of war in favor of the Americans was the Battle of Saratoga, which was crucial in securing French support for the American cause.

King Philip's War erupted due to various tensions and conflicts between New England settlers and Native Americans, and not specifically because a praying Indian and Harvard graduate was assassinated by a Wampanoag; therefore,

User Heyjinkim
by
7.0k points