Final answer:
False, The claim about the British surprise attack killing over 50 American soldiers and wounding over 100 is not directly corroborated by the provided historical references. Instead, various battles showed different outcomes, often with large British casualties and strategic implications.
Step-by-step explanation:
The initial statement suggesting the British surprise attacked the Americans and killed over 50 soldiers and injured over 100 does not correspond with the provided historical accounts of battles. Rather, various skirmishes and battles between the British and American forces during the American Revolutionary War and thereafter had different outcomes.
For instance, during the Battle of Bunker Hill, which is actually misnamed and should be Breed's Hill, the British suffered high casualties, losing 226 soldiers and having over 800 wounded despite technically winning the battle. This battle was a strategical boost for American morale.
Many Indian tribes did indeed align with the British during the American Revolutionary War, largely due to concerns over American expansion and loss of lands, thus making the statement regarding Native American support for the British true. Furthermore, the British navy did capture American ships and impress sailors, and British forces did not abandon their posts in the Northwest Territory as required by Jay's Treaty. These are factual accounts of British actions during periods of hostilities.
It is also noted that British commanders such as Lord Charles Cornwallis, Sir Henry Clinton, Sir William Howe, and others led forces much larger than the Americans in various encounters. Lastly, in the Battle of New Orleans, the British had more than 2,000 casualties in contrast to a few American casualties, marking a severe defeat for the British.