Final answer:
Advertising agencies often prefer the group system for its ability to foster continuity in client servicing by maintaining consistent, quality interactions and fostering strong client relationships. The system aligns with the trend towards less hierarchical and more collaborative organizational structures, while also considering the merits-based bureaucracy concerns about employee independence and responsiveness to leadership.
Thus the corret opction is:b
Step-by-step explanation:
Many advertising agencies prefer the group system because it leads to continuity in client servicing.
In this context, continuity refers to the ability to maintain a consistent, high-quality service to clients over time.
In group-based systems, teams are generally formed around clients or projects, allowing the same group of individuals to work with certain clients over extended periods, thus fostering strong relationships and deep understanding of the client's needs.
Moreover, the group system can contribute to the creation of an environment where the most qualified individuals are likely to succeed within the organization, promoting dedication to both the work and the agency.
This structure, reflecting a modern shift from hierarchical bureaucracy to more flat and team-oriented structures, encourages collaboration and feedback across all levels.
However, a possible downside to the group system within large bureaucratic structures is the risk of employees becoming too independent of the elected leaders or the core management team.
While independence is sometimes desired to avoid nepotism and favoritism, excessive independence can lead to a lack of responsiveness to political or organizational change, steering actions toward personal preferences rather than the goals of elected leaders or agency directives.
This is especially true in merits-based bureaucracies, as opposed to the spoils systems of old, where loyalty and patronage were the primary means of ascending within an organization.