Final answer:
Economic goals significantly influence government involvement in the economy, making the statement false. Neoclassical economists believe the market will self-correct unemployment, and real-world government intervention must be evaluated on its actual effectiveness in policy implementation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that economic goals have no effect on the amount of government involvement in the economy is false. Economic goals of a country are a significant factor that influences how much the government chooses to participate in the economy. For example, if a government's economic goal is to achieve full employment, it may intervene more heavily in the economy through fiscal and monetary policies. On the other hand, if the aim is to maintain a free market with minimum government interference, then the level of involvement would likely be low. Neoclassical economists argue that the government does not need to do much about unemployment because the market will self-correct through mechanisms such as wage adjustments. However, whether one agrees or disagrees with this view might depend on the consideration of actual market conditions and the effectiveness of government interventions. In the real world, government intervention can be necessary to address issues such as monopolies and negative externalities. However, the effectiveness of policy measures also depends on the government's ability to correctly identify and implement appropriate solutions. Both market strengths and weaknesses, as well as government strengths and weaknesses, must be considered to make sensible economic policy judgments without idealizing or demonizing either.