Final answer:
Pennsylvania favored a legislature where representation was based on population and supported a bicameral system. They also wanted executive power to be held by one individual and opposed the counting of slaves for representation, reflecting the state's stance against slavery.
Step-by-step explanation:
Pennsylvania's perspective on the representation in the new government's legislature held that it should be based on population. This stance was reflected in their own state constitution, which provided for representation based on the number of taxable residents and called for reapportionment through a census every seven years. Pennsylvania, being one of the larger states, supported a bicameral legislature consistent with the Virginia Plan, ensuring that states with more population, like itself, would have greater representation in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This would contrast with the desires of smaller states that wanted equal representation regardless of size, aligning more with the New Jersey Plan. Pennsylvania also regarded the executive power as something that should be vested in a single individual to ensure responsibility and ease of oversight. Furthermore, reflective of the sentiment toward slavery, Pennsylvania was among those who wanted to prohibit the importation of slaves and did not want slaves to be counted for representation in the legislature, underscoring the belief in the principles of liberty and moral concerns about slavery.