Final answer:
The question involves comparing negotiation styles of Japanese and Korean negotiators in light of historical events such as colonial rule, war, and political negotiations. It illustrates how historical contexts, like Japanese occupation of Korea and the Korean War armistice, may affect contemporary negotiation behaviors.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question compares negotiation styles and tactics between Japanese and Korean negotiators. It touches on cultural and historical contexts that can influence negotiation behavior, such as the use of questioning, commands, facial expressions, self-disclosures, and silent periods. It's important to understand that negotiation styles can be deeply rooted in historical experiences, such as Japan's colonial rule over Korea and the conflicts and negotiations that took place before, during, and after that period. For instance, the American insistence on Japanese withdrawal from China without conditions leading up to WWII, the colonial history between Japan and Korea, and negotiations during the Korean War provide a backdrop for understanding the negotiation behavior of both cultures. The atrocities committed during the colonial period, like forced sexual slavery and downplaying of Korean independence movements, have left a lasting impact on the Korean psyche and could influence their modern negotiation tactics. Furthermore, post-WWII negotiations, such as the armistice between North and South Korea, demonstrate the complexities of political dialogue and might shed light on current negotiation behaviors and strategies utilized by Korean negotiators.