Final answer:
Sandy's research question should be qualitative, open-ended, and designed to spark reasoned debate without bias, focusing on the societal or personal implications of the phrase 'not compensated by insurance'. It must be answerable and consequential to lead to a variety of substantial answers.
Step-by-step explanation:
Sandy's research question revolves around the interpretation of the phrase 'not compensated by insurance'. This is likely to be a qualitative question in the realm of social studies, particularly if it pertains to societal views, legal interpretations, or people's experiences with insurance. Sandy's question would be better if it is open-ended, leading to a variety of plausible answers, and consequently sparking a reasoned debate. A well-phrased research question encourages subjects to offer unguided and unbiased responses, thus avoiding the researcher's bias and allowing for candid replies from subjects that are not swayed towards any specific answer.
A good research question should be consequential; the outcome must matter and affect others, hence why Sandy's phrase 'not compensated by insurance' could lead to an extensive range of implications worth exploring. It should be constructed in a way that helps the researcher to gain trust, empathize, and listen without judgment. Research questions akin to 'How does being uninsured affect individuals' daily life decisions?' or 'In what ways does the lack of insurance compensation impact the financial stability of families?' are examples of how the research question can engage with complex social realities without suggesting a right or wrong answer.