Final answer:
The existence of multiple information systems leads to redundancies, discrepancies, and integration issues, but not inherently to efficiency, which is an intended positive aspect of bureaucracies and contradicts the disarray caused by multiple systems without coordination.
Step-by-step explanation:
The existence of multiple systems providing information can lead to various complications such as redundancies, discrepancies, and integration issues. However, one outcome that they do not inherently produce is efficiency. Efficiency is typically associated with streamlined processes and reduced waste, while redundancies and discrepancies usually imply duplication of efforts or conflicting information, which can hinder efficiency. Integration issues can also emerge when attempting to synchronize multiple systems, potentially causing delays or errors that are counterproductive to efficient operations. In the context of bureaucracies, increased efficiency is an intended positive aspect, yet multiple information systems without proper coordination may not support this goal. This contrasts with cognitive dissonance, which refers to the discomfort experienced when holding conflicting beliefs or attitudes, thereby disrupting our sense of consistency.