Final answer:
To resolve conflicts in research sources, Aldina should assess the credentials and biases of authors, internally review the consistency and evidence of sources, evaluate authority levels and corroborating details across various types of publications, and exercise healthy skepticism and critical thinking.
Step-by-step explanation:
When Aldina encounters conflicting authorities addressing her research question, she should approach the situation by evaluating the credibility and authority of the sources. She should research the author to determine if they are experts in the field or biased, which can influence the information presented. A critical assessment involves checking for an author's professional credentials, examining for any potential conflicts of interest, and recognizing if the author has been peer-reviewed, indicating a higher level of reliability.
Secondly, Aldina should review internally by comparing how one source's information supports or contradicts the information from other sources. She should consider the evidence used to support the information and whether it can be verified. It's important to identify if there's evidence of bias that could skew the information presented.
Aldina should also use a variety of sources, including in-depth analysis found in authoritative textbooks and peer-reviewed journals, and compare them with information from credible websites and shorter newspaper articles. While sometimes limited in scope, these can provide corroborating facts or references that help in gaining a comprehensive understanding of her research topic.
Lastly, Aldina should practice critical thinking and healthy skepticism when assessing each claim, considering the expertise of the person making the claim, the possible motivations behind the claim, and how other researchers view the claim. Ensuring she has a balanced view of the subject by considering these various aspects will help Aldina reach a well-informed conclusion.