Final answer:
The false statement about the modular approach is that it's always a faster approach than parallel. The modular approach can provide flexibility and cost savings, but there is no guarantee it always outperforms the parallel method in speed.
Step-by-step explanation:
You have asked which statement regarding the modular approach is false. The modular approach to system implementation is one where the system is divided into modules and each one is implemented and tested independently. This can provide increased flexibility and may allow parts of the system to be used more quickly than redeveloping the entire system at once. This approach is often referred to as the phased approach.
Let's evaluate the statements provided:
- A. It is also referred to as the phased approach. This is true as the modular approach involves implementing a system in phases.
- B. It can be combined with the parallel or the direct approach. This is true, mixing different approaches can allow capturing the benefits of each.
- C. It is always a faster approach than parallel. This is false. While the modular approach can be more efficient in some cases, there's no guarantee it is always faster than the parallel approach, where old and new systems run concurrently to mitigate risk.
- D. It can combine the safety and control of a parallel implementation with cost/time savings of the direct approach. This is true, as it allows for a more controlled implementation while also enabling quicker deployment of individual modules.
Therefore, the false statement about the modular approach is C, it is not always a faster approach than parallel.