74.9k views
3 votes
Which statement about South Africa's constitution is incorrect?

a) Its Bill of Rights includes a safeguard concerning sexual choice.
b) It retained an element of power-sharing, specifying that cabinets must be racially representative.
c) Although much of it can be amended with a simple two-thirds majority in the national assembly, there are some elements that are more difficult to amend as they require a 75 percent majority.
d) It was drafted by the first democratically elected parliament, although that body generally had to include elements that were agreed to prior to the drafting process.

User Samps
by
8.0k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The incorrect statement about South Africa's constitution is that cabinets must be racially representative. The Constitution focuses on individual rights rather than mandating racial representation in government bodies.

Step-by-step explanation:

The incorrect statement about South Africa's constitution is option b) It retained an element of power-sharing, specifying that cabinets must be racially representative. South Africa's constitution, ratified in 1996, was a significant step away from the apartheid past and aimed to establish a society based on democratic values, social justice, and fundamental human rights. The constitution includes a comprehensive Bill of Rights, which ensures rights such as equality, human dignity, freedom from discrimination and the right to privacy. It does not mandate racial representation in the cabinet, which is a departure from power-sharing models. The constitution was indeed drafted by the first democratically elected parliament and includes elements agreed upon prior to the drafting process. Additionally, while many sections of the constitution can be amended with a two-thirds majority in the national assembly, certain foundational provisions require a higher threshold of a 75 percent majority.

User Evyatar
by
7.9k points