Final answer:
Without specific financial data, the truthfulness of the statement that EY received more from HealthSouth for audit-related fees than non-audit fees cannot be determined. One would need to refer to HealthSouth's financial disclosures to answer this question accurately.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to whether EY (Ernst & Young) received more from HealthSouth for audit-related fees than for non-audit fees. To answer this correctly, one would need to look at the financial disclosures of HealthSouth detailing the fees paid to EY during the relevant period. Typically, audit firms charge their clients for both audit services (such as financial statement audits or internal control audits) and non-audit services (which can include consulting, tax advice, and other advisory services). While the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 put some restrictions on the non-audit services that auditors can provide to their audit clients to avoid conflicts of interest, it is still possible for a company to pay more for one type of service than the other.
Without specific financial data, we can't confirm whether the statement is true or false. However, historical cases like HealthSouth, which was involved in a major corporate fraud scandal in the early 2000s, often lead to detailed examination of audit and non-audit fees paid to the auditors as a part of the investigation process. If this is a historical question related to that period, it might be the case that HealthSouth's audit-related fees exceeded non-audit fees, as generally expected and required for independence.