Final answer:
A court interpreting laws to create or promote social change and address moral issues is engaged in judicial activism, wherein judges use their power to promote individual rights, often going beyond the original text of the Constitution.
Step-by-step explanation:
When a court interprets laws in a way that creates or promotes social change and wrestles with moral issues, it is engaging in judicial activism. This is a judicial philosophy where judges may use their power to promote broader personal liberties and justice, often being willing to overturn legislative or executive actions they find infringe on these rights, going beyond the text of the Constitution. Judicial activism is contrasted with judicial restraint, where judges tend to limit their power, adhering closely to the Constitution's original meaning and deferring to legislatures. Judges engaging in judicial activism view the Constitution as a living document, interpreting it in the light of societal changes and current needs.