Final answer:
Cohen's essay is evaluated as effective due to complex sentence structures, rhetorical strategies, and inclusive language that addresses cultural issues, all of which engage the audience and add depth to the text analysis.
Step-by-step explanation:
The effectiveness of Cohen in weaving multiple texts into a cohesive essay can be assessed by several criteria. Firstly, the essay adheres to the editing focus as intended in the chapter, employing a variety of complex sentence structures to combine independent clauses, which point towards a mastery of language use.
The writer is also described as fully engaging the audience, employing strategies like rhetorically effective expression, thought-provoking questions, and appreciation for multiple perspectives to keep the reader engaged and reflective about the topic.
Additionally, the essay not only adheres to summarizing, paraphrasing, and evaluating the main text but also illustrates the writer's consciousness of meeting or challenging conventional expectations in their writing.
This kind of alignment shows a sophisticated command of language and rhetorical strategies. Furthermore, the text communicates cultural ideas using inclusive language, addressing cultural issues of both the writer and the audience, which expands the essay’s depth and relatability.
In regard to other texts, the essay analyzes and elucidates the connections from literature, philosophical theories, historical events, or social movements, offering a deeper understanding of the relationships and impacts of these elements. The writer's intent to shine light on previously neglected aspects of the text being analyzed further adds to the richness of the analysis.
In conclusion, multiple indicators suggest that Cohen weaves various elements together in a way that is attentive to both language and content, thus providing a comprehensive and rhetorically effective review.