Final answer:
The Supreme Court's decision in FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate is not detailed in the reference but is related to campaign finance reform. Prior decisions have focused on lifting restrictions on campaign contributions, expanding the rights of corporate spending in elections.
Step-by-step explanation:
In FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate, the Supreme Court made decisions pertaining to campaign finance reform, specifically relating to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA). While details of the FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate case are not directly provided in the material referenced, considering the historical context of campaign finance decisions such as Buckley v. Valeo, McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and McCutcheon v.
Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court has struck down various campaign finance restrictions. This included striking down limits on personal spending by candidates (Buckley v. Valeo), and allowing corporations to spend unlimited amounts on elections (Citizens United)