Final answer:
The appeal of Eastern conceptions of society and human flourishing lies in their communal, integrative, and environmentally sustainable values. In contrast, Western conceptions emphasize individual autonomy and reason.
Personal preferences may vary, with some finding a blended approach of Eastern collectivism and Western individualism to be optimal for promoting well-being.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering whether Eastern or Western conceptions of society and human flourishing are more appealing, it's important to note the distinct philosophical underpinnings of each. The Eastern conception often emphasizes collective well-being and harmony, aligning with Confucian, Aztec, and Daoist thought systems, which prioritize community, ethical well-being, and the alignment with natural and social orders.
Conversely, Western conceptions have traditionally been more individualistic and anthropocentric, centering around the development of personal autonomy, reason, and human-centric ethics as seen in the works of philosophers like Immanuel Kant.
Personally, I am drawn to the Eastern approach for its communal and integrative aspects, which I believe fosters a more cooperative and sustainable way of life. This preference stems from values like interconnectedness, balance, and the belief in the cultivation of virtues that benefit the collective whole. In addition, the Eastern conception's appreciation of nature and its intrinsic value resonates with contemporary concerns for environmental sustainability.
When assessing modern motivational factors in the West such as beauty, love, discovery, conquest, and freedom, I find that Eastern conceptions provide a complementary perspective by also incorporating values like mindfulness and contentment. It is valuable to consider how traditional Western individualism can be balanced with Eastern collectivism to fuel motivations in a way that promotes both personal and societal well-being.