Final answer:
The issue of fighting for territorial ownership of Kalayaan Island is intertwined with the Philippines' complex historical relationship with the United States, characterized by annexation, resistance, and the eventual pursuit of self-governance. Any decision on asserting territorial claims must take into account past lessons and the importance of diplomatic solutions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question whether Filipinos should fight for territorial ownership of Kalayaan Island is deeply rooted in history and international relations. The history of the Philippines, particularly the era of U.S. annexation and control, sheds light on the long-standing issues of sovereignty and national identity. In that period, American policymakers like President McKinley justified retaining ownership of the Philippines to provide a gateway to Asian markets, among other strategic interests, despite local resistance to U.S. rule and suppression of Filipino aspirations for self-governance.
Given the historical context, the choice to fight for ownership of the islands could be seen as an extension of the Philippines' pursuit of complete independence and control over its own territory. However, any action taken should consider the international norms and the potential for diplomatic resolutions to avoid the intense conflicts witnessed in the country's past.