Final answer:
Without specific statistical evidence from the given information, we cannot definitively conclude that opposing gun laws is independent of favoring the death penalty, as attitudes may be influenced by broader societal values, cultural contexts, and emotional responses to events.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine whether opposing the gun law is independent of favoring the death penalty, we should analyze the given context and statistical information provided. According to the information regarding political behavior and public opinion on capital punishment and gun laws, people's stance on one issue may influence their stance on the other due to underlying moral principles or political alignments. However, the data provided does not offer explicit correlation figures between the positions on these two issues. Therefore, without specific statistical evidence, we cannot definitively conclude that opposing gun laws is independent of favoring the death penalty or vice versa.
The various pieces of information suggest that these attitudes are shaped by broader societal values, existing laws, and emotions evoked by recent events. For instance, the death penalty's constitutionality affirmed in Jurek v. Texas reflects legal backing for the use of capital punishment, which might influence public opinion. Simultaneously, responses to mass shootings and the Second Amendment rights suggest that opinions on gun control are also deeply embedded within a political and cultural context. These contextual factors suggest that attitudes towards the issues could be related, although without direct evidence of independence, we cannot make a concrete assumption.