Final answer:
Direct quotes are used to highlight specific words of the writer, especially when original words are precise, powerful, or vivid. The correct answer is option 2.
Step-by-step explanation:
When determining whether to directly quote a source or to paraphrase, you would opt to directly quote when you want to highlight the specific words used by the author. This approach is chosen especially when the original words are precise, clear, powerful, or vivid, and such exact wording cannot be replicated to the same effect through paraphrasing. Using a direct quotation preserves the power, tone, or specificity of the original author's language, which would otherwise be lost if rephrased. Quoting is also favored when the author's choice of words has a significant impact, like in cases of authoritative statements or lively and colorful expressions. It is crucial, though, to ensure that direct quotations complement your own analysis and do not overshadow your voice in your writing. When quoting, always remember to explain or analyze the quotations as they do not speak for themselves and should be integrated into your own narrative seamlessly.
In contrast, paraphrasing should be utilized when the ideas presented in the source material are either too long or complex, or filled with jargon that would be more effectively communicated in simpler terms within your own writing style. Paraphrasing allows the information to be more accessible and maintains the coherence of your writing voice, which is particularly advantageous when drawing upon multiple sources. Regardless of the method used, whether it is a direct quote, a summary, or a paraphrase, proper citation is imperative to credit the original sources and to avoid plagiarism, thereby upholding academic integrity and enabling readers to follow up on the sources for further information.
Therefore, the correct option when deciding to directly quote a source over paraphrasing is Option 2: When you need to highlight the specific words of the writer.