Final answer:
The statement given is False. The driver of a vehicle, if having the authority or consent from the owner, may give consent to a police officer to search the vehicle, except in cases where another occupant objects in a home setting as specified in Georgia v. Randolph.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'If the driver of the car is not the owner of the car, consent to search the vehicle cannot be given to a police officer by the driver' is False. Under the Fourth Amendment, individuals are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. However, if the driver of the vehicle has consent from the owner to use the car and is considered to have control over the vehicle, they may have the authority to consent to a search. There are particular circumstances, such as the Georgia v. Randolph case, which specify that consent cannot be given for a search if one occupant consents and another objects, but this pertains to a home setting.
Potential exceptions to the requirement of a warrant include situations where an officer has probable cause to believe a crime has been committed, there is a reasonable expectation that evidence might be destroyed, or the items in question are in plain view. It is also worth noting decisions like Riley v. California that specify more stringent requirements for searching digital information on a cell phone, which requires a warrant even when an individual has been arrested. Hence, the legality of the search depends on circumstances, the type of property, and reasonable expectations of privacy.