154k views
0 votes
The philosophy of judicial activism would suggest that the Supreme Court should

a. Totally disregard judicial precedent.
b. Promote governmental interference in people's lives.
c. Interpret the law to protect rights of individuals to achieve social justice.
d. Protect people from unreasonable government interference in their lives.

1 Answer

0 votes

Final answer:

The philosophy of judicial activism would suggest that the Supreme Court should:
c. Interpret the law to protect rights of individuals to achieve social justice.

Step-by-step explanation:

The philosophy of judicial activism posits that the Supreme Court should play an active role in interpreting and applying the law to protect and promote the rights and liberties of individuals, particularly in pursuit of social justice. Judicial activists are more inclined to interpret the

Constitution and other laws in a way that addresses contemporary social and moral issues, even if it involves departing from strict adherence to precedent. They believe that the Court should take a proactive stance in safeguarding individual rights and liberties, addressing inequalities, and rectifying injustices in society. This approach often involves decisions that expand or redefine constitutional rights and protections to meet the evolving needs and values of society.

Therefore, the correct answer is: c. Interpret the law to protect rights of individuals to achieve social justice.

User Rgm
by
7.9k points