Final answer:
Evidence in the Osage murder case would include tangible items, testimonies, and other legally acquired evidences directly related to the case. Hearsay is typically inadmissible, except in specific circumstances like admissions of guilt or dying declarations.
Step-by-step explanation:
The evidence admitted in the Osage murder case would typically consist of tangible items, witness testimonies, financial records, or forensic evidence that relate directly to the crimes committed against the Osage Nation members. In the specific context of the question, no detailed list of evidence can be provided without additional information. However, the general rule is that in cases like this, evidence must be directly related to the case and have been acquired legally to be admissible in court.
Concerning evidence not admissible in court, as described in the Sixth Amendment, hearsay is generally inadmissible unless it constitutes an admission of guilt by the defendant or a dying declaration. The judge may also exclude any testimony deemed irrelevant or prejudicial to ensure a fair trial for those accused.
From the quote by Adams, the evidence discussed is largely hypothetical and focuses on legal arguments concerning the right to defend oneself and the gradations of charges from murder to manslaughter based on the severity of the provocation.