Final answer:
The abuse of a suspect in a police station would typically be considered an occupational crime because it is an illegal act that arises from opportunities within one's occupation. It falls under the individual's responsibility, but the government could also share accountability due to systemic factors that contribute to such behaviors.
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the definition of occupational crime, the abuse of a suspect in a police station could indeed be considered an occupational crime. Occupational crimes are illegal acts committed through opportunities created in a legal business or occupation. This type of crime is often committed by individuals during the course of their employment. Therefore, when a police officer abuses a suspect within the confines of a police station, it's an abuse of power granted by their occupation. However, visible crimes, such as violent or street crimes, are perpetrated by individuals and are more obvious to the public. Abuse by police could also be considered a violent crime, given that it involves the use of force.
In terms of accountability, both the government and the individual can bear responsibility. The individual officer is culpable for their actions, as they are the direct perpetrator of the crime. At the same time, the government or the police department could be held responsible for systemic issues that allow such abuse to occur, such as lack of proper oversight, inadequate training, or a culture that implicitly condones misconduct.