180k views
3 votes
How did the Electoral College solve a conflict between the principles of federalism and popular sovereignty?

A. By granting more power to state governments.
B. By ensuring direct popular election of the president.
C. Through a system of representative voting.
D. By allowing state legislatures to appoint electors.

User Koi
by
7.8k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final Answer:

Electoral College solve a conflict between the principles of federalism and popular sovereignty Through a system of representative voting. (option c)

Step-by-step explanation:

The Electoral College reconciled the tension between federalism and popular sovereignty by employing a system of representative voting. This mechanism allows for the indirect election of the president, wherein electors are chosen by the states based on their representation in Congress.

The Electoral College reflects federalism by balancing the influence of individual states and the national government. Each state's number of electors corresponds to its congressional representation, comprising both senators and representatives. This system maintains a degree of state autonomy in selecting electors while considering the popular vote within each state.

It upholds the principle of popular sovereignty by involving the public in choosing electors. Although citizens vote for their preferred candidate, they're effectively voting for a slate of electors pledged to that candidate. The College's design integrates both state and citizen participation in the presidential election process, aligning with the foundational principles of federalism and popular sovereignty.

This method was a compromise by the Framers, enabling a balance between state power and citizen influence in selecting the president. By employing representative voting (option c) through the Electoral College, the Framers aimed to address concerns about direct democracy while ensuring state involvement in the presidential election process.

User JoeyCK
by
6.9k points