Final answer:
Depending on the context, one might argue against you with malice and hostility, or with an aim to establish mutual understanding. Arguing without any specific purpose or without considering opposing views are other, less constructive ways an argument might unfold. It's important to articulate a clear viewpoint, support it with evidence, and empathically address counterclaims.
Step-by-step explanation:
An argument can occur in different contexts, and the manner in which someone would argue against you can vary.
a) With malice and hostility: In this context, an argument is likely to be hate-filled and destructive, aiming to undermine the opponent rather than seeking truth or resolution.
b) With a goal to establish mutual understanding: Here, a friendly debate is intended where both parties respect each other's viewpoints and aim to reach a common ground or deeper comprehension of the subject.
c) With no specific purpose: This could indicate a casual or aimless exchange where the debate may not lead to any constructive outcome.
d) Without considering opposing views: Such an argument is unproductive, as it shuts down dialogue and dismisses the possibility of gaining insights from different perspectives.
Presenting a clear viewpoint in any argument is crucial. Supporting your viewpoint with evidence and reasoning is essential, just as acknowledging and empathetically addressing counterclaims can strengthen your argument. For example, explaining both the historical significance and the contemporary impact of a Civil War statue can provide a balanced view of why some may support or oppose its removal.