Final answer:
Historically, interaction between the small militia, Native Americans, and squatters often resulted in conflict due to different concepts of land ownership, with Native Americans typically resisting forced land surrender, leading to tensions and violence.
Step-by-step explanation:
The interactions between the small militia, Native Americans, and squatters historically were complex and often ended in conflict. Native Americans and squatters had very different concepts of land and property. Native populations believed in shared usage of land, moving seasonally to follow resources and lacking the European concept of individual land ownership. As settlers expanded westward, driven by the promise of land and wealth, their permanent settlements, with defined borders and fences, clashed with native practices. Conflict and resistance ensued as settlers, often with militia support, forced Native Americans off their ancestral lands.
Examples such as the Dakota conflict illustrate the brutal escalation of violence and the ultimate loss of Native American homelands. Based on historical precedents, the likelihood of voluntary land surrender by Native Americans and squatters seems low, and the possibility of ongoing tensions, resistance, and potential violence is high.