Final answer:
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 aimed to resolve conflicts related to healthcare accessibility and affordability, involving constitutional debates over Congress's power to tax and the mandate for health insurance. Despite challenges, the Supreme Court upheld the law.Option C is the correct answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conflict that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (also known as the ACA or "Obamacare") was supposed to resolve was related to the accessibility and affordability of healthcare. This act addressed vital issues of public health and economic disparities by seeking to make health insurance more attainable to a wider segment of the American population. The aspects of constitutional law in conflict centered on the extension of Congress's power and the mandate requiring every citizen to have health insurance. Challenges about its constitutionality led to a Supreme Court ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, which upheld the ACA.
The ACA brought about significant changes to the healthcare system, including attempts to bring the United States closer to universal coverage. Some state governors and various interest groups challenged the law through court actions. In spite of the legal challenges and debates about the role of the federal government in providing health care services, two Supreme Court decisions have largely left the ACA intact.