Final answer:
The essay 'The Overprotected Kid' likely utilizes a well-rounded argumentative strategy that includes evidence, acknowledges counterarguments and maintains a balance between emotional engagement and logical reasoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The essay titled The Overprotected Kid seems to demonstrate a number of argumentative strategies. Firstly, it identifies and supports a viewpoint with evidence and reasoning. This could include a variety of supports such as facts, opinions, and paraphrases that contribute to the argument’s ethos or credibility. It is likely that the paper also includes citations of researched material that bolster these points.
Furthermore, an effective argumentative essay would not only present a claim but also acknowledge potential counterarguments and provide refutations. This shows the writer’s fairness and their ability in appealing to the logic and emotions of their readers. It is a sign of a well-rounded argument when the writer demonstrates an awareness of the rhetorical situation, considering their audience, the cultural context, and utilizing appropriate language and structure in their writing.
Lastly, the use of emotionally engaging elements such as thought-provoking questions, interesting statistics, or detailed anecdotes plays a significant role in drawing readers into the essay and provoking them to consider the topic more deeply. However, it is critical that these are balanced with logical reasoning to prevent sloppy associative reasoning, where readers might mistake the arguer's characteristics for the validity of the argument itself.