Final answer:
Cicero responds to turmoil with a focus on rhetoric and civic order, emphasizing the degradation of Roman institutions, while Casca reacts to a storm emotionally, seeing it as an ominous sign of societal unrest and the displeasure of the gods.
Step-by-step explanation:
The reactions of Cicero and Casca to the violent storm exemplify contrasting views and behaviors in response to chaos and destruction. Cicero, through his oratory presented in the passages, demonstrates an approach grounded in civic duty and a plea for order amidst political turmoil and personal loss. His response to distress is intellectual, seeking justice and stability through the power of words and legal institutions. In contrast, Casca's reaction is rooted in physical experience and superstition, perceiving the storm as an omen of looming battles and societal upheaval. This perspective is more emotional and sensory, with a primal fear or appreciation for the storm's raw power.
While Cicero employs rhetoric to lay bare the debasement of Roman institutions and to appeal for the restoration of senatorial dignity, Casca is depicted in literary representations as overwhelmed by the celestial display, interpreting the storm’s violence as a sign of the gods' displeasure or a portent of chaotic events to come. In conclusion, Cicero's response to crisis is reasoned and political, while Casca's is instinctive and prescient.