The debate on whether embracing ancestral culture is necessary for completeness is multifaceted, with arguments for deepening self-understanding through heritage and counterarguments emphasizing the diverse factors shaping identity.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether people can only be complete once they embrace their ancestral culture is a broad and nuanced topic. One could argue that embracing one's ancestral culture can lead to a deeper understanding of oneself and one's roots, providing a sense of continuity and identity. This may be particularly true in societies where ancestral culture is overshadowed by dominant cultures, and individuals feel disconnected from their heritage. On the other hand, forming one's identity is a complex process influenced by various factors, such as personal experiences, environment, and personal choices, beyond just ancestral culture.
Opposing this view, it's important to recognize that individuals are complex and can find completeness in a multitude of ways. One need not be bound to ancestral culture to feel complete; instead, personal growth, experiences, and the cultures one actively engages with can also shape identity. In the ever-evolving mosaic of global society, identity can be fluid and adaptive, showing that completeness is not solely dependent on ancestral culture, but can also be fostered by the myriad of influences that make up one's life.