Final answer:
The correct answer is option (d). This choice reflects the evaluative nature of the analysis that involves using criteria such as social context and secondary sources to explore similarities with the novel's ideas.
Step-by-step explanation:
When analyzing content that primarily uses commentary to explain an individual's research, the most fitting completion for the analysis would be a comparison. In this context, Coco is examining how the novel's ideas align with Elinor Ostrom’s research.
The author uses criteria such as characters, plot elements, and especially social context to draw parallels between the novel and the research. Using a relevant secondary source, the analysis provides a deeper insight into the similarities and differences between the two, which is a hallmark of a comparison. The passage provided implies that the analysis is not just restating information (summary), nor is it expressing judgment (critique), nor emphasizing differences (contrast), but rather evaluating the novel's ideas in relation to Ostrom's research findings.
Given the focus on social context and the use of a secondary source for the analysis, the correct option for completing Coco's examination of "A Nobel Prize winner’s novel idea" is comparison.