214k views
1 vote
The most difficult type of cash embezzlement for auditors to detect is when it occurs

A) after the merchandise has been shipped.
B) before the merchandise has been shipped.
C) before the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing.
D) after the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing.

User Giardino
by
7.9k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

The most difficult type of embezzlement to detect is before the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most difficult type of cash embezzlement for auditors to detect is typically when it occurs after the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing. Therefore, the correct option is:

D) after the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing.

This is because once a fraudulent entry is made in the accounting records, it becomes more challenging for auditors to identify irregularities or discrepancies, especially if proper internal controls are not in place or if there is collusion among employees involved in the embezzlement.

Detecting embezzlement that occurs after the recording of cash transactions often requires thorough examination, forensic auditing techniques, and a detailed understanding of the organization's financial processes.

User Luis Beltran
by
7.3k points
4 votes

Final Answer:

The most difficult type of cash embezzlement for auditors to detect is when it occurs before the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or other cash listing (C).

Step-by-step explanation:

Cash embezzlement occurring before the cash is recorded in the cash receipts journal or any cash listing is the most challenging for auditors to detect. In this scenario, fraudulent activities happen before any official documentation, making it elusive during typical auditing procedures. Embezzlement that takes place after the cash is recorded leaves a trail in the books, making it comparatively easier to identify during audits. However, when manipulation occurs before the transactions are recorded, it bypasses traditional audit trails, making detection considerably more challenging.

When cash embezzlement occurs after merchandise has been shipped (option A) or before the merchandise has been shipped (option B), there is typically a paper trail related to inventory, invoices, or shipping documents that can be cross-checked during an audit. In contrast, embezzlement before cash is recorded (option C) doesn't leave immediate traces, allowing perpetrators to cover their tracks more effectively.

Auditors rely on examining recorded transactions and their corresponding documentation. In instances where fraudulent activities happen before any recording occurs, auditors might face significant difficulty in uncovering such manipulations, highlighting the complexity of detecting pre-entry cash embezzlement.

User Infoclogged
by
7.8k points