Final answer:
Heroes who develop their good qualities are figures that hone their virtues through practice and experience, as suggested by philosophical and literary texts. Figures like Aristotle emphasized that virtues come about as a result of habit, while historical narratives consider the broader laws and events that shape heroism.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'created heroes who developed their good qualities and were not born with them' suggests a focus on characters or historical figures who honed their virtues and strengths over time rather than being innately endowed with them. In literature and philosophical texts, such as those by Aristotle, there is an emphasis on the development of virtues and character through experience and habit.
Similarly, historical interpretations, like those offered by Tolstoy, consider heroes not as standalone agents with an innate will but as individuals shaped by and shaping the broader laws and events of history. These notions challenge the idea that heroes are born as such and instead posit that their heroism is cultivated through actions, decisions, and experiences.
In the context of historical and philosophical analysis, individuals become virtuous or heroic through practicing virtues, engaging in the actions that define them, and navigating the complexities of their environments. This perspective is reflected in the idea that moral virtues come about as a result of habit and are perfected over time through practice, as discussed by Aristotle.
In contrast, intellectual virtues develop mainly through teaching and experience. The growth of a hero's character, therefore, is seen as a dynamic process, influenced both by nature and nurture.