Question

In the practice of science, how is the accuracy of a scientific claim evaluated?

A) By carefully gathering and analyzing a variety of opinions from the public
B) By repeating the experiments that led to the claim being made
C) By testing the claim's predictions in a controlled setting
D) By critically considering alternative scientific claims or explanations

Answer 1

The accuracy of a scientific claim is evaluated by repeating experiments to test the validity of the initial hypothesis, with supportive results increasing its acceptance. The correct option is B) By repeating the experiments that led to the claim being made

Step-by-step explanation:

The accuracy of a scientific claim is evaluated primarily through the method of repeating the experiments that led to the original claim. This process falls under the scientific method, where a hypothesis is formed and then tested using controlled experiments. During these experiments, data is systematically collected and analyzed to determine whether the results support or refute the hypothesis. If the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, it is rejected, and alternative explanations are considered. Conversely, if multiple experiments support the hypothesis, it becomes more accepted as a valid description of natural phenomena. It is important to note that while multiple supportive experiments increase confidence in a hypothesis, they do not prove it unequivocally. Critical thinking, skepticism, and considering the expertise and potential biases of claimants play a role in evaluating scientific claims.

The correct option is B) By repeating the experiments that led to the claim being made